The Righteous Mind
  • About The Author
    • Bio
    • Interviews & Lectures
    • Essays I’ve Written
    • Upcoming Talks
  • About the Book
    • Reviews
    • Endorsements
    • Introductory Chapter
    • Discussions of the Book
    • Figures/Notes/Refs
  • Buy The Book
  • Applying Moral Psych
    • Capitalism and Morality
    • Business Ethics
    • Viewpoint Diversity in the Academy
    • Coddling of the American Mind
    • For Teachers & Book Clubs
    • To Politics and Civility
    • In Business
    • In Religious Communities
    • In Therapy and Coaching
    • How You Can Help
  • Videos
  • Blog
Home » 2012 Campaign » Follow the Sacredness
Mar21 2

Follow the Sacredness

Posted by Jonathan Haidt in 2012 Campaign, Moral Foundations in Action, Politics, Videos

Politics is so weird in part because voters are not pursuing their self-interest, they’re pursuing their group interest. And even for group interest, it’s often not about the group’s material interests, it’s about protecting their sacred totems. Circling around sacred objects helps a group cohere. So if you want to understand why we’re suddenly all talking about birth control and abortion at a time when economic matters are so much more important, follow the sacredness. I explain this in more detail in a NYT Review essay, here,

and also in a 2 minute  NYT video, below:

If you want to learn more about sacred values in action, read the work of Scott Atran, e.g., here on war, and read chapters 11 and 12 of The Righteous Mind.

2 Comments

  1. V Robin Reese | March 24, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    Wow, what a great interview you did on Point of Inquiry! I’m mentioning it here to encourage you to make an entry for it on this blog. The same goes for the NYT book review and the side interview with Saletan.

    Reply
  2. Karen McKim | March 25, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    I loved your book and favorably reviewed it on my blog.

    I agree that the idea of ‘sacredness’ is key, but I think it’s a stretch to say that the central sacredness for OWS is ‘care for the vulnerable.’ The ‘care’ concern that you see at OWS is not just for the vulnerable and oppressed. In fact, the choice of the 99% label seems intended to convey an image incompatible with vulnerability or oppress-ability. Identify OWS’s many ‘time-consuming, wealth-consuming’ practices, and what are they designed to honor? The democratic community itself.

    The sacredness of OWS and many other liberals (including me) is the entire community, the populace, the hive itself and the network of interdependencies that all of us—not just the vulnerable—rely on. Our moral outrage is not triggered by routine unfairness, but by massive imbalances in power and wealth that are threatening the health of the American hive–the “corporate superorganisms” that you described so well in your book.

    Karen McKim, Wisconsin

    Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Recent Posts

  • Why The Righteous Mind may be the best common reading for incoming college students
  • How not to improve the moral ecology of campus
  • How the Democrats Can Use Moral Foundations Theory Against Trump
  • The politics of disgust animated for the age of Trump
  • Where political identities come from, in one cartoon

Archives

  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012

Subscribe

  • Entries RSS

© 2018 The Righteous Mind

© 2011 The Righteous Mind | Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress